§ 66-2. Development to be consistent with comprehensive plan; determination of consistency.

(a)

No development activity may be approved unless it is found that the development is consistent with the city comprehensive plan and that the provision of certain public facilities will be available at prescribed levels of service concurrent with the impact of the development on those facilities.

(b)

If a development proposal is found to meet all the requirements of this Code, it shall be presumed to be consistent with the comprehensive plan in all respects except for compliance with the concurrency requirement. The development technical review committee, other public officials, or any citizen may, however, question the consistency of a development proposal with the comprehensive plan. If a question of consistency is raised, the chief zoning and code compliance officer, building official or planning and zoning board, depending on which is responsible for approving the development, shall make a determination of consistency or inconsistency and support that determination with written findings.

(Code 1985, §§ 155.29.01, 155.29.03)